[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLlf6ZQ1uNjs8XS+@days-ASUSLaptop>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 17:48:21 +0800
From: Dong Yang <dayss1224@...il.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, anup@...infault.org,
atish.patra@...ux.dev, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: riscv: selftests: Enable supported test cases
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 10:36:10AM -0500, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 03:35:48PM +0800, dayss1224@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Dong Yang <dayss1224@...il.com>
> >
> > Add supported KVM test cases and fix the compilation dependencies.
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Reorder patches to fix build dependencies
> > - Sort common supported test cases alphabetically
> > - Move ucall_common.h include from common header to specific source files
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Delete some repeat KVM test cases on riscv
> > - Add missing headers to fix the build for new RISC-V KVM selftests
> >
> > Dong Yang (1):
> > KVM: riscv: selftests: Add missing headers for new testcases
> >
> > Quan Zhou (2):
> > KVM: riscv: selftests: Use the existing RISCV_FENCE macro in
> > `rseq-riscv.h`
> > KVM: riscv: selftests: Add common supported test cases
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 6 ++++++
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c | 1 +
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h | 1 +
> > .../selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c | 1 +
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 1 +
> > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h | 3 +--
> > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
> In the future please CC previous reviewers on the entire series
> (particularly when they have reviewed the entire previous series).
Okay, I will pay attention to this in the future. Thanks.
>
> For the series,
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists