linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: core: Rearrange variable declarations involving _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54bcd1e6-aa6d-425d-8ba1-575ae0b67823@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:47:20 +0800
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: core: Rearrange variable declarations
 involving __free()

> On 03-09-25, 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> Follow cleanup.h recommendations and always define and assign variables
>> in one statement when __free() is used.
>>
>> No intentional functional impact.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   27 +++++++--------------------
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
>

Reviewd-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>