[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250905121723.GCaLrU04lP2A50PT-B@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:17:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: Remove code depending on
__GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 09:29:29AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
> index 371f7906019e..1f80a62be969 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
> @@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ static __always_inline u64 __cmpxchg64_local(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 old, u64 new
> bool ret; \
> \
> asm_inline volatile(_lock "cmpxchg8b %[ptr]" \
> - CC_SET(e) \
> - : CC_OUT(e) (ret), \
> + : "=@ccz" (ret), \
Any particular reason you're not using =@cce here?
I know, they're equivalent but why then switch to =@...?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists