linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: A fix, a __free()-based simplification, and a follow-up adjustment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5028967.GXAFRqVoOG@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 15:51:11 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
 Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: A fix,
 a __free()-based simplification, and a follow-up adjustment

Hi All,

This series is following up a discussion on a patch submitted by Zihuan Zhang,
and this message in particular:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0gN1T5woSF0tO=TbAh+2-sWzxFjWyDbB7wG2TFCOU01iQ@mail.gmail.com/

The first patch fixes the bug described in the message linked above, the
second one makes a __free()-based simplification based on it, and the
third one makes one more adjustment on top of the two previous patches.

Please see the changelogs for details.

Thanks!