linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 13/19] staging: media: tegra-video: tegra20: set VI HW revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250905180837.35547304@booty>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 18:08:37 +0200
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Thierry Reding
 <treding@...dia.com>, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, Jonathan
 Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Sowjanya Komatineni
 <skomatineni@...dia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter
 <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann
 <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Peter De
 Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, Prashant Gaikwad
 <pgaikwad@...dia.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen
 Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Greg
 Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Dmitry Osipenko
 <digetx@...il.com>, Charan Pedumuru <charan.pedumuru@...il.com>,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/19] staging: media: tegra-video: tegra20: set VI
 HW revision

On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:16:25 +0300
Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com> wrote:

> Tegra20, Tegra30 and Tegra114 have VI revision 1.

Why? You should mention the reason in the commit message.

But I don't see hw_revision used in the series, so unless I missed
something you should drop this patch.

Luca

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com