[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4suklxl4t6ulo5ndlvw23rk6cgpza2b5qfrudszn4oothihyuv@zgelxgrgfe4k>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:27:51 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, asantostc@...il.com,
efault@....de, calvin@...nvd.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: selftest: Introduce netconsole
torture test
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:59:25PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 11:00:39 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Create a netconsole test that puts a lot of pressure on the netconsole
> > list manipulation. Do it by creating dynamic targets and deleting
> > targets while messages are being sent. Also put interface down while the
> >
> > In order to do it, refactor create_dynamic_target(), so it can be used to
> > create random targets in the torture test.
>
> You either have to post it in the same series as the fix, or wait for
> the fix to be present in net-next. Without your pending fix this will
> obviously not pass thru the CI :/
Ack! I've sent the netpoll fix and the selftest in the same patchset, as
you suggested.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250905-netconsole_torture-v3-0-875c7febd316@debian.org/
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists