linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250905174928.GFaLsiqKV36JDowX94@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 19:49:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
	Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>,
	zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
	Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>,
	Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@...ux.microsoft.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get()
 references

On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 09:24:07PM +0800, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> This patchset converts all remaining cpufreq users to rely on the
> __free(put_cpufreq_policy) annotation for policy references, instead of
> calling cpufreq_cpu_put() manually.

Sep 01 Zihuan Zhang ( :8.6K|) [PATCH v3 00/12] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references
Sep 03 Zihuan Zhang ( :  65|) [PATCH v4 00/10] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references
Sep 05 Zihuan Zhang ( :8.3K|) [PATCH v5 0/6] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references

Please stop the spamming. While waiting, go read how this kernel process thing
works:

From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

Don't get discouraged - or impatient
------------------------------------

After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
busy people and may not get to your patch right away.

Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
but the development process works more smoothly than that now.  You should
receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
that you have sent your patches to the right place.  Wait for a minimum of
one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
busy times like merge windows.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette