[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4aa5d0d-da66-4350-a9e1-ce7fb39f2961@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 19:52:36 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, fenghuay@...dia.com,
baisheng.gao@...soc.com, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/33] arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and
kbuild boiler plate
Hi Rob,
On 27/08/2025 17:16, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 10:39 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:32 AM James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Probing MPAM is convoluted. MSCs that are integrated with a CPU may
>>> only be accessible from those CPUs, and they may not be online.
>>> Touching the hardware early is pointless as MPAM can't be used until
>>> the system-wide common values for num_partid and num_pmg have been
>>> discovered.
>
> [...]
>
>>> +static int mpam_dt_parse_resources(struct mpam_msc *msc, void *ignored)
>>> +{
>>> + int err, num_ris = 0;
>>> + const u32 *ris_idx_p;
>>> + struct device_node *iter, *np;
>>> +
>>> + np = msc->pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + for_each_child_of_node(np, iter) {
>>
>> Use for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped()
>>
>>> + ris_idx_p = of_get_property(iter, "reg", NULL);
>>
>> This is broken on big endian and new users of of_get_property() are
>> discouraged. Use of_property_read_reg().
>
> Err, this is broken on little endian as the DT is big endian.
>
> So this was obviously not tested as I'm confident you didn't test on BE.
'not tested' is shades of grey. I fed the FVP ~6 different DTB files to hit the different
paths through the driver. The FVP only has controls under RIS-0, so all of those only
defined RIS-0, and unsurprisingly didn't notice the helper isn't endian safe.
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists