[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLtg4PIb1Xd6WTP0@ros-3.wdc.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 15:14:56 -0700
From: Kamaljit Singh <kamaljit.singh@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cassel@...nel.org, dlemoal@...nel.org, kamaljit.singh1@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] nvme-core: exclude ioccsz/iorcsz checks for admin
ctrlr
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 03:49:23PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 02:10:01PM -0700, Kamaljit Singh wrote:
> > An administrative controller does not support I/O queues, hence it
> > should exclude existing checks for IOCCSZ/IORCSZ.
> >
> > - if (!nvme_discovery_ctrl(ctrl) && ctrl->iorcsz < 1) {
> > + if (!nvmf_discovery_ctrl(ctrl) && !nvme_admin_ctrl(ctrl) && ctrl->iorcsz < 1) {
>
> Excessive line length over 80 chars.
>
> Perhaps, though, we should have a helper to indicate IO controllers
> rather than chaining conditions for everything that isn't one.
Sure, I'll add a new function nvme_is_io_controller() and make it dependent
on nvmf_discovery_ctrl() and nvme_admin_ctrl(). How does that sound?
Thanks,
Kamaljit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists