[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250905232657.GA1497794-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 18:26:57 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
kernel@...labora.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-valhall-csf: add
mediatek,mt8196-mali variant
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 12:22:57PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> The Mali-based GPU on the MediaTek MT8196 SoC is shackled to its concept
> of "MFlexGraphics", which in this iteration includes an embedded MCU
> that needs to be poked to power on the GPU, and is in charge of
> controlling all the clocks and regulators.
>
> In return, it lets us omit the OPP tables from the device tree, as those
> can now be enumerated at runtime from the MCU.
>
> Add the mediatek,mt8196-mali compatible, and a performance-controller
> property which points to a node representing such setups. It's required
> on mt8196 devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-valhall-csf.yaml | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-valhall-csf.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-valhall-csf.yaml
> index a5b4e00217587c5d1f889094e2fff7b76e6148eb..6df802e900b744d226395c29f8d87fb6d3282d26 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-valhall-csf.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-valhall-csf.yaml
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - rockchip,rk3588-mali
> + - mediatek,mt8196-mali
> - const: arm,mali-valhall-csf # Mali Valhall GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
>
> reg:
> @@ -53,6 +54,13 @@ properties:
> opp-table:
> type: object
>
> + performance-controller:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> + description:
> + A phandle of a device that controls this GPU's power and frequency,
> + if any. If present, this is usually in the form of some specialised
> + embedded MCU.
We already abuse power-domains binding with both power and performance.
There's a performance-domain binding too, but only used on one platform
for CPUs (Mediatek too IIRC). Or perhaps you could just point to an
empty OPP table. I don't think you have anything new here, so don't
invent something new.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists