linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/cfi: Standardize on common "CFI:" prefix for CFI reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202509041740.1A8F3A8@keescook>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 17:40:27 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@...gle.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/cfi: Standardize on common "CFI:" prefix for
 CFI reports

On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:40:04AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 08:46:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Use a regular "CFI:" prefix for CFI reports during alternatives setup,
> > including reporting when nothing has happened (i.e. CONFIG_FINEIBT=n).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> 
> Obviously minor but I had pointed out on v1 that there appears to be
> some inconsistency within the diff around capitalization, "ignoring" vs.
> "Ignoring".

Oops! Sorry, I've fixed that locally now.

-- 
Kees Cook