[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904185628.0de3c483@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:56:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Basierski <sebastian.basierski@...el.com>
Cc: Konrad Leszczynski <konrad.leszczynski@...el.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>, Karol
Jurczenia <karol.jurczenia@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: stmmac: check if interface is running
before TC block setup
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 21:01:49 +0200 Sebastian Basierski wrote:
> On 9/1/2025 10:03 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > More context would be useful. What's the user-visible behavior before
> > and after? Can the device handle installing the filters while down?
> > Is it just an issue of us restarting the queues when we shouldn't?
>
> Before this patch driver couldn't be unloaded with tc filter applied.
>
> Running those commands is enough to reproduce the issue:
> tc qdisc add dev enp0s29f2 ingress
> tc filter add dev enp0s29f2 ingress protocol all prio 1 u32
> rmmod dwmac_intel
>
> in effect module would not unload.
Makes sense. Could you also confirm that the offload doesn't in fact
work if set up when device is down? I think block setup is when qdisc
is installed?
ip link set dev $x down
tc qdisc add dev enp0s29f2 ingress
ip link set dev $x up
tc filter add dev enp0s29f2 ingress protocol all prio 1 u32 ...
If it doesn't work we can feel safe we're not breaking anyone's
scripts, however questionable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists