linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] i2c: rtl9300: remove broken SMBus Quick operation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56c6c0fa-e2a7-4493-99ef-128b8974dd0b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 12:12:23 +0200
From: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@....de>,
 Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>, Harshal Gohel <hg@...onwunderlich.de>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] i2c: rtl9300: remove broken SMBus Quick
 operation support

Hi Andi,

On 04.09.25 00:59, Andi Shyti wrote:
> In the sense that I don't have this change in the fixes path, but
> I have it in the non-fixes. For now, until Wolfram pulls the
> fixes, I removed the patch and I will add it back next week to
> avoid conflicts in the -next branch.
>
> Next week I will apply the rest of the patches in the series, as
> well.

Thanks for taking care of this. 

I just got a new testing device with RTL9313 on my desk with which I could test
the two-master functionality. Thanks to this, I noticed a bug in the last patch of
my series before it is merged completely.

Due to a misunderstanding of how 'device_property_read_u8' works and that it
does not read '1' out of 'realtek,scl = <1>;' in the device tree, the second
master didn't work.

How is the usual way to proceed on this? Should I just resubmit my patchset,
except the first 3 patches you already merged in your tree, to have that fix?

> Thanks,
> Andi
>
>

Best,
Jonas Jelonek