linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] dd ethernet support for RPi5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8574e531-fc4d-4f36-886b-6e7fc0656da3@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:43:57 +0300
From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, Phil Elwell
 <phil@...pberrypi.com>, Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>,
 Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] dd ethernet support for RPi5

Hi Jacub,

On 9/5/25 4:49 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:47:57 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> netdev maintainers, I took patches 4 and 5 through the Broadcom ARM SoC 
>>> tree, please take patches 1 through 3 inclusive, or let me know if I 
>>> should take patch 2 as well.  
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up! Let me take patch 3 right now.
> 
> s/patch 3/patch 2/
> 
>> I'm a bit unclear on where we landed with the parallel efforts to add
>> the >32b address support :(
> 

If you talk about 1/5 from this series, you can ignore it for now. I'll
monitor the fixes series from Théo Lebrun and will resend it if needed.

regards,
~Stan