[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLrQKurGZkbCkjlw@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:57:30 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrei Kuchynski <akuchynski@...omium.org>
Cc: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Jameson Thies <jthies@...gle.com>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
"Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@...e.de>,
Venkat Jayaraman <venkat.jayaraman@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] USB Type-C alternate mode priorities
Hi Andrei,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 02:57:45PM +0000, Andrei Kuchynski wrote:
> This patch series introduces a mechanism for setting USB Type-C alternate
> mode priorities. It allows the user to specify their preferred order for
> mode selection, such as USB4, Thunderbolt, or DisplayPort.
>
> A new sysfs attribute named 'priority' is exposed to provide user-space
> control over the mode selection process.
>
> This series was tested on a Android OS device running kernel 6.16.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - The priority variable is now a member of the typec_altmode struct
> - typec_altmode2port is used to obtain the typec_port struct pointer
> - Default priorities are now set based on the order of registration
> - The mode_control capability is enabled by default
> - The mode_selection_state struct will be introduced in a separate series
> - svid will be used instead of the typec_mode_type enum
>
> Andrei Kuchynski (5):
> usb: typec: Add alt_mode_override field to port property
> platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Set alt_mode_override flag
> usb: typec: ucsi: Set alt_mode_override flag
> usb: typec: Implement alternate mode priority handling
> usb: typec: Expose alternate mode priority via sysfs
I'm sorry for keeping you waiting. I think these are okay - although,
I had to put a few nitpicks :) but they are minor - but can you
include a patch where you use the priority member in a driver (maybe
cros_ec_typec.c)?
thanks,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists