linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix typos in PMIC/BBNSM documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e808c81d-0bab-459a-af9d-be9f84daef57@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 09:18:45 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Nick Huang <sef1548@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: maintainers-if-needed@...mple.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix typos in PMIC/BBNSM
 documentation

On 06/09/2025 05:19, Nick Huang wrote:
> This patch series contains minor typo fixes in the Device Tree bindings
> documentation for MFD nodes, including PMIC and BBNSM descriptions. These
> corrections improve readability and ensure consistent documentation for
> developers using these bindings.
> 
> This series builds upon and complements the previous v1 patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250902142749.13724-1-kusogame68@gmail.com/
> 
<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof