[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025090638-arson-scrawny-ceb5@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:53:59 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] driver core/PM: Two updates related to power.no_pm
On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 9:09 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they
> > > > > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions)
> > > > > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency).
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to
> > > > > older kernels as well?
> > >
> > > So do you want me to resend these patches with suitable Cc: stable tags?
> > >
> > > Alternatively, I can just apply them with the tags and route them
> > > through my tree, whatever you prefer.
> >
> > In the absence of more feedback, this is what I'm going to do.
>
> Thanks, sorry for the delay, been swamped with conferences and travel :(
Wait, I can take them right now, no need to resend them.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists