[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wbuvnhcxh4flicbgipuql2otwv7oqkol2pmdyvschpudshejy4@euajhp2sgnyq>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 21:55:55 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Karmjit Mahil <karmjit.mahil@...lia.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Sync GPU registers from mesa
On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 10:05:40AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> In particular, to pull in a SP_READ_SEL_LOCATION bitfield size fix to
> fix a7xx GPU snapshot.
>
> Sync from mesa commit 76fece61c6ff ("freedreno/registers: Add A7XX_CX_DBGC")
>
> Cc: Karmjit Mahil <karmjit.mahil@...lia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 19 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c | 5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/registers/adreno/a6xx.xml | 718 ++++++++++--------
> .../msm/registers/adreno/a6xx_descriptors.xml | 40 -
> .../drm/msm/registers/adreno/a6xx_enums.xml | 50 +-
> .../drm/msm/registers/adreno/adreno_pm4.xml | 179 ++---
> 7 files changed, 524 insertions(+), 497 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 2e2090f52e26..3f5c4bcf32cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ static void a6xx_set_pagetable(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
> * Needed for preemption
> */
> OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_MEM_WRITE, 5);
> - OUT_RING(ring, CP_MEM_WRITE_0_ADDR_LO(lower_32_bits(memptr)));
> - OUT_RING(ring, CP_MEM_WRITE_1_ADDR_HI(upper_32_bits(memptr)));
> + OUT_RING(ring, lower_32_bits(memptr));
> + OUT_RING(ring, upper_32_bits(memptr));
Could you please comment, why are we droping all these accessors?
> OUT_RING(ring, lower_32_bits(ttbr));
> OUT_RING(ring, upper_32_bits(ttbr));
> OUT_RING(ring, ctx->seqno);
> @@ -278,9 +278,8 @@ static void a6xx_set_pagetable(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
> */
> OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM, 6);
> OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_0_FUNCTION(WRITE_EQ));
> - OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_1_POLL_ADDR_LO(
> - REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_SRAM_INIT_STATUS));
> - OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_2_POLL_ADDR_HI(0));
> + OUT_RING(ring, REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_SRAM_INIT_STATUS);
> + OUT_RING(ring, 0);
> OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_3_REF(0x1));
> OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_4_MASK(0x1));
> OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_5_DELAY_LOOP_CYCLES(0));
> @@ -1320,14 +1319,14 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>
> /* Set weights for bicubic filtering */
> if (adreno_is_a650_family(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_x185(adreno_gpu)) {
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE_0, 0);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE_1,
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE(0), 0);
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE(1),
> 0x3fe05ff4);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE_2,
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE(2),
> 0x3fa0ebee);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE_3,
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE(3),
> 0x3f5193ed);
> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE_4,
> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_TPL1_BICUBIC_WEIGHTS_TABLE(4),
> 0x3f0243f0);
> }
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists