[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jzooq6qg3y7nee2nz6lujustdf4z7vtn6t2slikw43dann5sbk@2telraae26tl>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 22:42:22 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Frank Wang <frank.wang@...k-chips.com>,
Zhang Yubing <yubing.zhang@...k-chips.com>, Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>,
Maud Spierings <maud_spierings@...mail.com>, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-usbdp: add improved
ports scheme
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 10:24:54PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 08:26:02PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Currently the Rockchip USBDP PHY as a very simply port scheme: It just
> > offers a single port, which is supposed to point towards the connector.
> > Usually with 2 endpoints, one for the USB-C superspeed port and one for
> > the USB-C SBU port.
> >
> > This scheme is not good enough to properly handle DP AltMode, so add
> > a new scheme, which has separate ports for everything. This has been
> > modelled after the Qualcomm QMP USB4-USB3-DP PHY controller binding
> > with a slight difference that there is an additional port for the
> > USB-C SBU port as the Rockchip USB-DP PHY also contains the mux.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-usbdp.yaml | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-usbdp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-usbdp.yaml
> > index 8b7059d5b1826fdec5170cf78d6e27f2bd6766bb..f728acf057e4046a4d254ee687af3451f17bcd01 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-usbdp.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-usbdp.yaml
> > @@ -114,6 +114,29 @@ properties:
> > A port node to link the PHY to a TypeC controller for the purpose of
> > handling orientation switching.
> >
> > + ports:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > + properties:
> > + port@0:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description:
> > + Output endpoint of the PHY for USB (or DP when configured into 4 lane
> > + mode), which should point to the superspeed port of a USB connector.
>
> What abourt USB+DP mode, where each one gets 2 lanes?
Right, I guess we would need one port more and have one port for
lane 0 + 1 and one port for 1 + 2. For USB-C both ports are
connected to the USB-C superspeed port. For DP 4-lane mode the
same is done for the input port of the connector. Last but not
least for 2 lanes USB + 2 lanes DP, one port can be connected
to the USB connector and one port can be connected to the DP
connector.
> > + port@1:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description: Incoming endpoint from the USB controller
> > +
> > + port@2:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description: Incoming endpoint from the DisplayPort controller
> > +
> > + port@3:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description:
> > + Output endpoint of the PHY for DP, which should either point to the
> > + SBU port of a USB-C connector or a DisplayPort connector input port.
>
> I would suggest describing this port as 'DisplayPort AUX signals to be
> connected to the SBU port of a USB-C connector (maybe through the
> additinal mux, switch or retimer)'. It should not be confused with the
> actual DisplayPort signals (as those go through the port@0).
>
> In the Qualcomm world we currently do not describe this link from the
> PHY to the gpio-mux or retimer, but I think we will have to do that
> soon.
It does looks like no upstream platform does a proper description of
USB-C setups :(
Thanks for having a look,
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists