[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250907121647.425fb8d1@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 12:16:47 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Matti Vaittinen
<matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Marcelo
Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, Javier Carrasco
<javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, Tobias Sperling
<tobias.sperling@...ting.com>, Antoniu Miclaus
<antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>,
Esteban Blanc <eblanc@...libre.com>, Herve Codina
<herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Ramona Alexandra Nechita
<ramona.nechita@...log.com>, Eason Yang <j2anfernee@...il.com>, Pop Ioan
Daniel <pop.ioan-daniel@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: adc: Support ROHM BD79112 ADC/GPIO
> >> +/* ADC channels as named in the data-sheet */
> >> +static const char * const bd79112_chan_names[] = {
> >> + "AGIO0A", "AGIO1A", "AGIO2A", "AGIO3A", "AGIO4A", /* 0 - 4 */
> >> + "AGIO5A", "AGIO6A", "AGIO7A", "AGIO8A", "AGIO9A", /* 5 - 9 */
> >> + "AGIO10A", "AGIO11A", "AGIO12A", "AGIO13A", "AGIO14A", /* 10 - 14 */
> >> + "AGIO15A", "AGIO0B", "AGIO1B", "AGIO2B", "AGIO3B", /* 15 - 19 */
> >> + "AGIO4B", "AGIO5B", "AGIO6B", "AGIO7B", "AGIO8B", /* 20 - 24 */
> >> + "AGIO9B", "AGIO10B", "AGIO11B", "AGIO12B", "AGIO13B", /* 25 - 29 */
> >> + "AGIO14B", "AGIO15B", /* 30 - 31 */
> >
> > O-o-key, but why not power-of-two per line (esp. taking into account
> > the whole size)? (Whatever, it's not something I would fight for.)
>
> I just filled the rows to the maximum width, while keeping the item
> count same for each row and adding the comment.
>
> I'm not really sure having 4 items / row, and adding one row more would
> be much better, but not much worse either. I can do this if you think
> it's better. (No need to even fight for that).
In this case I'd do it in 4s purely because then the B ones start on
a new line and that looks nicer ;)
>
> >> +};
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> + data->vref_mv = ret / 1000;
> >
> > Yeah, mV, (MICRO / MILLI) and other things I leave to other people to discuss.
>
> Thanks Andy. I've a feeling we were somewhat stuck on this discussion
> anyways. I suppose it's nice to hear other's opinions if someone else
> really cares. This was approaching bikeshedding.
>
I'll just throw a quick comment in here.
I'm absolutely in favour of the defines as they help in several ways.
- Stop counting 0s when there are lots of them.
- Provide information on the unit conversion not otherwise visible
where they happen to be used (often avoids need for local variables etc).
- Consistency across a code base.
In this particular case none apply strongly enough to force the issue.
Even so I'd prefer the units.h macros are used for the consistency reason
but I won't refuse to merge the driver over this.
One of those perfect (to me) being the enemy of good cases.
p.s. Matti, 3 versions in 4 days? Perhaps slow down a little.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists