linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/45] 5.4.299-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32b78edd-c8a3-45d1-92df-9facadb61d89@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 14:28:40 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/45] 5.4.299-rc1 review



On 9/7/2025 2:08 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/7/2025 12:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.299 release.
>> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/ 
>> patch-5.4.299-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable- 
>> rc.git linux-5.4.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
> BMIPS_GENERIC:
> 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
> 
> Looks like we have a minor regression introduced in the 5.4.297 cycle 
> that I will be solving separately:

Looks like we are missing 9bd9c8026341f75f25c53104eb7e656e357ca1a2 
("usb: hub: Fix flushing of delayed work used for post resume purposes") 
in the 5.4.y branch, while we do have 
a49e1e2e785fb3621f2d748581881b23a364998a ("usb: hub: Fix flushing and 
scheduling of delayed work that tunes runtime pm"), looks like the 
cherry pick is not exactly clean, will work on that later today.
-- 
Florian