linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] module : fix signature checker pointer arithmetic and bounds check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aLzeAZGc4Mv8wAIx@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 18:21:05 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Fidal Palamparambil <rootuserhere@...il.com>
Cc: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, petr.pavlu@...e.com, da.gomez@...nel.org,
	samitolvanen@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module : fix signature checker pointer arithmetic and
 bounds check

On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 07:45:49PM +0400, Fidal Palamparambil wrote:
> From: Fidal palamparambil <rootuserhere@...il.com>
> 
> This patch fixes :
>  - invalid module_param type (bool_enable_only → bool)
>  - unsafe pointer arithmetic on void *
>  - missing bounds check for sig_len, preventing underflow/OOB
>  - export set_module_sig_enforced for consistency
> 
> Signed-off-by : Fidal Palamparambil <rootuserhere@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fidal palamparambil <rootuserhere@...il.com>

I will ask that other maintainer ignore your patches moving forward.
Clearly this is garbage gen AI crap code. The list, the double SOB,
and your clear wreckless post is a good example to just never want
to apply any patch from you.

  Luis