lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <epbqhjyfdt3daudp2wx54jsw6d7jf6ifbr3yknlfuqptz7b4uq@73n5k6b2jrrl>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:08:52 +0200
From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
CC: <sohil.mehta@...el.com>, <baohua@...nel.org>, <david@...hat.com>,
	<kbingham@...nel.org>, <weixugc@...gle.com>, <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	<alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>, <kas@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<trintaeoitogc@...il.com>, <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, <yuanchu@...gle.com>,
	<joey.gouly@....com>, <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
	<graf@...zon.com>, <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, <kees@...nel.org>,
	<ardb@...nel.org>, <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>, <glider@...gle.com>,
	<thuth@...hat.com>, <kuan-ying.lee@...onical.com>,
	<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
	<vbabka@...e.cz>, <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	<samuel.holland@...ive.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <corbet@....net>,
	<xin@...or.com>, <dvyukov@...gle.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <jason.andryuk@....com>, <morbo@...gle.com>,
	<nathan@...nel.org>, <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<brgerst@...il.com>, <kristina.martsenko@....com>, <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	<luto@...nel.org>, <jgross@...e.com>, <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	<urezki@...il.com>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <ada.coupriediaz@....com>,
	<hpa@...or.com>, <leitao@...ian.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <surenb@...gle.com>, <ziy@...dia.com>,
	<smostafa@...gle.com>, <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>, <ubizjak@...il.com>,
	<jbohac@...e.cz>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<guoweikang.kernel@...il.com>, <rppt@...nel.org>, <pcc@...gle.com>,
	<jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, <will@...nel.org>,
	<jhubbard@...dia.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] kasan: x86: Handle int3 for inline KASAN reports

On 2025-09-08 at 14:54:32 +0200, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
>On 2025-09-08 at 12:38:57 +0200, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
>>On 2025-09-06 at 19:19:01 +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>>On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:30 PM Maciej Wieczor-Retman
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_inline.c b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_inline.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..9f85dfd1c38b
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_inline.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +#include <linux/kasan.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kdebug.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +bool kasan_inline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int metadata = regs->ax;
>>>> +       u64 addr = regs->di;
>>>> +       u64 pc = regs->ip;
>>>> +       bool recover = metadata & KASAN_RAX_RECOVER;
>>>> +       bool write = metadata & KASAN_RAX_WRITE;
>>>> +       size_t size = KASAN_RAX_SIZE(metadata);
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (user_mode(regs))
>>>> +               return false;
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (!kasan_report((void *)addr, size, write, pc))
>>>> +               return false;
>>>
>>>Hm, this part is different than on arm64: there, we don't check the
>>>return value.
>>>
>>>Do I understand correctly that the return value from this function
>>>controls whether we skip over the int3 instruction and continue the
>>>execution? If so, we should return the same value regardless of
>>>whether the report is suppressed or not. And then you should not need
>>>to explicitly check for KASAN_BIT_MULTI_SHOT in the latter patch.
>>
>>I recall there were some corner cases where this code path got called in outline
>>mode, didn't have a mismatch but still died due to the die() below. But I'll
>>recheck and either apply what you wrote above or get add a better explanation
>>to the patch message.
>
>Okay, so the int3_selftest_ip() is causing a problem in outline mode.
>
>I tried disabling kasan with kasan_disable_current() but thinking of it now it
>won't work because int3 handler will still be called and die() will happen.

Sorry, I meant to write that kasan_disable_current() works together with
if(!kasan_report()). Because without checking kasan_report()' return
value, if kasan is disabled through kasan_disable_current() it will have no
effect in both inline mode, and if int3 is called in outline mode - the
kasan_inline_handler will lead to die().

>
>What did you mean by "return the same value regardless of kasan_report()"? Then
>it will never reach the kasan_inline_recover() which I assume is needed for
>inline mode (once recover will work).
>
>-- 
>Kind regards
>Maciej Wieczór-Retman

-- 
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ