linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/104] 6.1.151-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a53318e-13f1-4c38-a9cb-88955247b666@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 20:00:39 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/104] 6.1.151-rc1 review



On 9/7/2025 12:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.151 release.
> There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.151-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

perf fails to build with:

util/bpf-utils.c: In function 'get_bpf_prog_info_linear':
util/bpf-utils.c:129:26: error: '__MAX_BPF_PROG_TYPE' undeclared (first 
use in this function); did you mean 'MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE'?
   129 |         if (info.type >= __MAX_BPF_PROG_TYPE)
       |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                          MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE
util/bpf-utils.c:129:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported 
only once for each function it appears in

which is due to  05c6ce9491f1851d63c40e918ed5cf7902fd43d3 ("perf 
bpf-utils: Harden get_bpf_prog_info_linear")

Looks like we need caf8f28e036c4ba1e823355da6c0c01c39e70ab9 ("bpf: Add 
BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD command") which adds the definition 
for __MAX_BPF_PROG_TYPE, unfortunately there is a lot going on there 
that this won't apply cleanly.
-- 
Florian