[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF7kqQmPAHedq4F-7T5fYH45WbOF=fWwSRbMcc7ZcSNxbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 16:52:53 +0200
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 6:05 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 06:00:04PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
>
> > Hello Mark,
>
> Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows
> readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> discussion is being addressed.
Hello Mark,
Noted, sorry for that.
> If we're going to convert everything I'd rather we do a sensible
> conversion now than have multiple rounds of conversions. I strongly
> suspect that most if not all of the current users don't know or care
> that system_wq is percpu.
Sure, we can do so. I will send the v2 hopefully with 1 patch only
(meaning that every system_wq can be converted to system_dfl_wq).
Thank you!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
marco.crivellari@...e.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists