[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aL73vC/fMowq42AV@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:35:24 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>, dlemoal@...nel.org,
jdmason@...zu.us, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v21 0/9] PCI: EP: Add RC-to-EP doorbell with
platform MSI controller
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 08:48:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:13:46 -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [3/9] PCI: endpoint: Add RC-to-EP doorbell support using platform MSI controller
> > commit: b537ffe0eb2ab458f20ec135cc2b565c63a2ea00
> > [4/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-ep-msi: Add MSI address/data pair mutable check
> > commit: 1f2ed78e43abb9ac0856a82867f64d472368a832
> > [5/9] PCI: endpoint: Add pci_epf_align_inbound_addr() helper for address alignment
> > commit: 1c2c5f9855a5cf4617bcda721c22dbd3345f06a1
> > [6/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Add doorbell test support
> > commit: 5d4da5f8092e5a77ae371ae1112283b59790ac22
> > [7/9] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add doorbell test case
> > commit: a1a293e709a4ec0fa2e4253993a4b75f581c6cf2
> > [8/9] selftests: pci_endpoint: Add doorbell test case
> > commit: b964b4894fcfc72e7496cf52a33cbba39d094c5b
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I wanted to test this on rk3588, so I added msi-map to the pcie_ep node.
>
> It works the first time:
> # ./pcitest -r pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST
> TAP version 13
> 1..1
> # Starting 1 tests from 1 test cases.
> # RUN pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST ...
> [ 17.996519] offset: 70040
> [ 17.997904] left: 250 status: 0x240
> # OK pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST
> ok 1 pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST
> # PASSED: 1 / 1 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Prints on EP side:
> [ 17.924761] pci_epf_test_enable_doorbell
> [ 17.926035] doorbell offset: 70040
> [ 17.927898] pci_epf_test_doorbell_handler
> [ 17.932816] pci_epf_test_disable_doorbell
>
>
>
> However, if I run the exact same test case again:
> # ./pcitest -r pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST
> TAP version 13
> 1..1
> # Starting 1 tests from 1 test cases.
> RUN pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST ...
> [ 34.672546] offset: 70040
> [ 35.688190] left: 0 status: 0x0
> [ 35.688480] pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: Failed to trigger doorbell in endpoint
> # pci_endpoint_test.c:258:DOORBELL_TEST:Expected 0 (0) == ret (-22)
> # pci_endpoint_test.c:258:DOORBELL_TEST:Test failed for Doorbell
>
> # DOORBELL_TEST: Test failed
> # FAIL pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST
> not ok 1 pcie_ep_doorbell.DOORBELL_TEST
> # FAILED: 0 / 1 tests passed.
>
> Prints on EP side:
> [ 34.600717] pci_epf_test_enable_doorbell
> [ 34.602086] doorbell offset: 70040
> [ 35.624718] pci_epf_test_disable_doorbell
>
>
>
> As you can see the print that I added in pci_epf_test_doorbell_handler()
> never comes the second time executing this test case.
>
>
> Frank, do you see the same problem?
I have not tested latest one yet. Look like inbound address have not switch
back to MSI ITS address after disable() and enable().
Frank
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists