[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250908155149.GD789684@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:51:49 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, miko.lenczewski@....com,
balbirs@...dia.com, peterz@...radead.org, smostafa@...gle.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, praan@...gle.com, zhangzekun11@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv1 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain
arm_smmu_invs array
On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 01:16:45AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > /*
> > * A sorted array allows batching invalidations together for fewer SYNCs.
> > * Also, ATS must follow the ASID/VMID invalidation SYNC.
> > */
> > sort_nonatomic(new_invs->inv, new_invs->num_invs,
> > sizeof(add_invs->inv[0]), arm_smmu_invs_cmp, NULL);
> > return new_invs;
This should be deleted, merge sort always makes sorted lists.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists