[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<175735141100.4178020.7968878718213061793.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:10:11 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, frederic@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
mhocko@...e.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bpf: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to
alloc_workqueue() users
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:53:06 +0200 you wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Below is a summary of a discussion about the Workqueue API and cpu isolation
> considerations. Details and more information are available here:
>
> "workqueue: Always use wq_select_unbound_cpu() for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND."
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [1/3] bpf: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/34f86083a4e1
- [2/3] bpf: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0409819a0021
- [3/3] bpf: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a857210b104f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists