linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v18 05/33] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6db614ec-2b4d-4700-9ce8-1bb958008fec@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:26:22 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
 Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: corbet@....net, tony.luck@...el.com, Dave.Martin@....com,
 james.morse@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, kas@...nel.org,
 rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
 frederic@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, kees@...nel.org,
 arnd@...db.de, fvdl@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
 pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, perry.yuan@....com,
 manali.shukla@....com, sohil.mehta@...el.com, xin@...or.com,
 Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com, peterz@...radead.org, tiala@...rosoft.com,
 mario.limonciello@....com, dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com, michael.roth@....com,
 chang.seok.bae@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, peternewman@...gle.com, eranian@...gle.com,
 gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 05/33] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable
 Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)

Hi Boris,

On 9/8/25 10:03, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:41:22AM -0500, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>> Apologies for not catching this earlier. I double checked to make sure
>>> we get this right and I interpret Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst
>>> to say that "Link:" should be the final tag.
>>>
>>
>> That’s fine. It wasn’t very clear to me in maintainer-tip.rst.
> 
> You don't need to worry about minor things like that - our scripts fix them up
> while applying.

Ok, sure. I don’t need to re-spin unless there are other comments.

> 
> As to Link tags, see this here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wh5AyuvEhNY9a57v-vwyr7EkPVRUKMPwj92yF_K0dJHVg@mail.gmail.com
> 

-- 
Thanks
Babu Moger