[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYuT0x3JSFWHMF5thH0UyNF1Cse+W9joE12yQ0iAAXjuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 23:03:31 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Benjamin Larsson <benjamin.larsson@...exis.eu>, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: airoha: fix wrong MDIO function bitmaks
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:14 PM Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:
> The usage of GPIO might be confusing but this is just to instruct the
> SoC to not mess with those 2 PIN and as Benjamin reported it's also an
> Errata of 7581. The FORCE_GPIO_EN doesn't set them as GPIO function
> (that is configured by a different register) but it's really to actually
> ""enable"" those lines.
>
> Normally the SoC should autodetect this by HW but it seems AN7581 have
> problem with this and require this workaround to force enable the 2 pin.
In reply to Andrews comment I copied the two above paragraphs into the
commit message in the applied patch.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists