[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aL9HVT0F5m3c2sG6@x1>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 18:15:01 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan McGrath <bmcgrath@...eweavers.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Rémi Bernon <rbernon@...eweavers.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf symbols: Fix HAVE_LIBBFD_BUILDID_SUPPORT build
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 08:47:12AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Anyway, what does this mean to fixing PE executables in LLVM? Perhaps
> the first 12 patches of:
Lots to digest, but to make progress, if you think you can resubmit a
trimmed down series after making sure it applies to perf-tools-next,
please do so and mention that in the cover letter.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists