lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250908061333.rwzq5dj4nxlav6x5@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:43:33 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: Always enforce policy limits even
 without frequency table

On 04-09-25, 13:48, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> I understand your point about the potential duplicate call to
> cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() for drivers with a valid freq-table.
> However, in the third patch of this series, we removed the call to
> cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify() from the table_verify path.

Yeah, I missed that.

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ