linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the battery tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc37b088-696f-4f91-9159-30e839b7ffb9@viavisolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:42:21 +0200
From: Fabien Proriol <fabien.proriol@...visolutions.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
 fabien.proriol@...oe.org,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the battery tree

Hi,

In fact, <fabien.proriol@...visolutions.com> is the email of my 
companies, unfortunately, the email server broke the indentation of my 
patch.
This why I used my own personal address to re-send the same commit 
(<fabien.proriol@...oe.org>).

For me, we can use either one without any problem, so, if you can change 
to use the same in the signed-off and the commit, it's OK for me.

How to process ? can you change it or, should I re-transmit the message 
again ?

Thanks,

Fabien Proriol

Le 08/09/2025 à 00:07, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
>    8543d1c462e2 ("power: supply: sbs-charger: Support multiple devices")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>
> Actually the author in the commit is
>
>    fabien.proriol@...oe.org <fabien.proriol@...oe.org>
>
> While the SoB line is
>
>    Signed-off-by: Fabien Proriol <fabien.proriol@...visolutions.com>
>
> We should prefer that they match.  Also we prefer full names in all
> email addresses.
>