[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aL6xTl9vzfczjxri@shredder>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:34:54 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Yangfl <mmyangfl@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Andy Roulin <aroulin@...dia.com>, Yong Wang <yongwang@...dia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>, Li Shuang <shuali@...hat.com>,
Alessandro Zanni <alessandro.zanni87@...il.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: forwarding: Reorder arguments to
obey POSIX getopt
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 05:39:58PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> Should I fix (ar)ping only in selftests, or fix iputils with that trick instead?
Looking at your patch, there are only a dozen incompatible invocations
of (ar)ping and they also go against the synopsis in the man page, so it
makes sense to adjust them. But this is going to be a fragile solution
since very few people seem to be running these selftests with a musl
based system, so I would also try to adjust iputils.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists