| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250908120229.7a4e6db9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:02:29 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Schuster <schuster.simon@...mens-energy.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing
List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:33:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the vfs-brauner tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:11,
> from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sleep/sleep.c:23:
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_init':
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'check_trace_callback_type_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)
> include/rv/instrumentation.h:18:48: note: in definition of macro 'rv_attach_trace_probe'
> 18 | check_trace_callback_type_##tp(rv_handler); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sleep/sleep.c:3:
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:260:49: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)'
> 260 | check_trace_callback_type_##name(void (*cb)(data_proto)) \
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON'
> 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), PARAMS(data_proto)) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE'
> 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT'
> 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT'
> 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:7,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:103,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:9,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:5,
> from include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:7,
> from include/linux/bitops.h:28,
> from include/linux/kernel.h:23,
> from include/linux/interrupt.h:6,
> from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5,
> from include/linux/ftrace.h:10,
> from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sleep/sleep.c:2:
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'register_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)
> include/linux/once_lite.h:28:41: note: in definition of macro 'DO_ONCE_LITE_IF'
> 28 | bool __ret_do_once = !!(condition); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> include/rv/instrumentation.h:19:17: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ONCE'
> 19 | WARN_ONCE(register_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:9: note: in expansion of macro 'rv_attach_trace_probe'
> 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:241:38: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)'
> 241 | register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON'
> 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), PARAMS(data_proto)) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE'
> 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT'
> 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT'
> 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_destroy':
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:92:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'unregister_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 92 | rv_detach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)
> include/rv/instrumentation.h:28:39: note: in definition of macro 'rv_detach_trace_probe'
> 28 | unregister_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:254:40: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)'
> 254 | unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON'
> 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), PARAMS(data_proto)) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE'
> 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT'
> 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT'
> 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:11,
> from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/pagefault/pagefault.c:19:
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_init':
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'check_trace_callback_type_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)
> include/rv/instrumentation.h:18:48: note: in definition of macro 'rv_attach_trace_probe'
> 18 | check_trace_callback_type_##tp(rv_handler); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/pagefault/pagefault.c:9:
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:260:49: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)'
> 260 | check_trace_callback_type_##name(void (*cb)(data_proto)) \
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON'
> 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), PARAMS(data_proto)) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE'
> 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT'
> 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT'
> 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:7,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:103,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:9,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:5,
> from include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:7,
> from include/linux/bitops.h:28,
> from include/linux/kernel.h:23,
> from include/linux/interrupt.h:6,
> from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5,
> from include/linux/ftrace.h:10,
> from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/pagefault/pagefault.c:2:
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'register_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)
> include/linux/once_lite.h:28:41: note: in definition of macro 'DO_ONCE_LITE_IF'
> 28 | bool __ret_do_once = !!(condition); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> include/rv/instrumentation.h:19:17: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ONCE'
> 19 | WARN_ONCE(register_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:9: note: in expansion of macro 'rv_attach_trace_probe'
> 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:241:38: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)'
> 241 | register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON'
> 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), PARAMS(data_proto)) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE'
> 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT'
> 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT'
> 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_destroy':
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:92:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'unregister_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 92 | rv_detach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task_newtask);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)
> include/rv/instrumentation.h:28:39: note: in definition of macro 'rv_detach_trace_probe'
> 28 | unregister_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:254:40: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int)'
> 254 | unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON'
> 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), PARAMS(data_proto)) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECLARE_TRACE'
> 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT'
> 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_EVENT'
> 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Presumably caused by commit
>
> edd3cb05c00a ("copy_process: pass clone_flags as u64 across calltree")
>
> I have used the vfs-brauner tree from next-20250829 for today.
I am still seeing this failure.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists