linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: dp-controller: document QCS8300 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c30b4f6c-3871-48c6-8836-a087b5fa80ce@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 19:00:05 +0800
From: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar
 <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: dp-controller: document
 QCS8300 compatible



On 9/8/2025 6:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 05:46:30PM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/5/2025 9:48 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 10:50:33AM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/4/2025 9:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 03:22:37PM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>>> Add compatible string for the DisplayPort controller found on the
>>>>>> Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Qualcomm QCS8300 platform comes with one DisplayPort controller
>>>>>> that supports 4 MST streams.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     .../bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml        | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
>>>>>> index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..ad08fd11588c45698f7e63ecc3218a749fc8ca67 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>>       compatible:
>>>>>>         oneOf:
>>>>>>           - enum:
>>>>>> +          - qcom,qcs8300-dp
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we use fallback to qcom,sa8775p-dp instead of declaring a completely
>>>>> new one?
>>>>>
>>>> I think we can not use fallback to sa8775p, since we don't have DP1
>>>> controller for QCS8300. SA8775P actually have 4 DP controllers (now only 2
>>>> really used). So in the hardware, i think it is different with SA8775P and
>>>> we need a new one.>>             - qcom,sa8775p-dp
>>>
>>> The DP controller is the same as the one present on SA8775P.
>>>
>> Yes, it is same.. I just want to confirm again—even if we only need DP0 for
>> QCS8300, we can also use sa8775p as fallback, right?
> 
> What makes you think that we can't? Let me repharse the question: which
> part of DP controller (single one) on QCS8300 is incompatible with the
> DP controller on SA8775P?
> 
Sure.. got this point.. will update next version.. for the single one , 
they are same...

Thanks.>>
>> static const struct msm_dp_desc msm_dp_desc_sa8775p[] = {
>>      { .io_start = 0x0af54000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0, .wide_bus_supported
>> = true },
>>      { .io_start = 0x0af5c000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1, .wide_bus_supported
>> = true },
>>      { .io_start = 0x22154000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_2, .wide_bus_supported
>> = true },
>>      { .io_start = 0x2215c000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_3, .wide_bus_supported
>> = true },
>>      {}
>> };
>> .mst_streams = 4 is suitable for both QCS8300 and SA8775P DP 0 here.
>>
>> Previously, my understanding here was that we might need a new compatible
>> for QCS8300.
>>
>> Thanks~~>>>>              - qcom,sc7180-dp
>>>>>>               - qcom,sc7280-dp
>>>
>>
>