lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b9fa19b-195b-4bee-8f51-6b00ff2fcb6a@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 14:00:40 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ray Jui
 <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>, "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...e.de>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-list@...pberrypi.com,
 Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] media: staging: Drop bcm2835-camera driver

Hi Jai,

[add Peter & Ivan to Cc]

Am 03.09.25 um 15:40 schrieb Jai Luthra:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Quoting Stefan Wahren (2025-08-28 00:48:22)
>> Hi Jai,
>>
>> Am 27.08.25 um 08:24 schrieb Jai Luthra:
>>> The bcm2835-camera driver is replaced by the V4L2 bcm2835-unicam driver
>>> that is already upstream. So drop it from staging.
>> AFAIK the old Raspberry Pi Camera V1 isn't supported by V4L2
>> bcm2835-unicam. Personally i'm fine with this, but this must be clear in
>> the commit message.Did you already talked to distributions like Redhat &
>> OpenSuSE about this step?
> As Dave mentioned, the OV5647 should work with V4L2. I don't have a sensor
> with me, but I can order one and try to get it working with the upstream
> kernel separate from this series.
>
> I did test the V2 camera module (IMX219) with my series applied on top of
> upstream kernel, and capture worked fine with bcm2835-unicam, so I don't
> believe V1 camera module should be an issue.
I was in holidays the last days, so I better reply to this thread / 
context even there is a V2 out yet.

Yes, this explains the technical part behind the motivation and I'm fine 
with this to speed up unstaging.
But my point was "Are the users informed about this step?". So I hope 
the extended Cc should do this job at least for popular distributions.

Best regards


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ