[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF4GJbL4wmjxDTQYJg7Mp_GjLVrR9trek7DqoH0EniX2uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 14:26:57 +0200
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/s390: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 1:38 PM Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
> > allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
> > reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
>
> A duplicate paragraph.
>
> Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Thank you, Alexander!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
marco.crivellari@...e.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists