[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <etltxzybqmhkst3324knpofx46lyp2vju43wvfu47oovfbmo5r@4v4nniat4sx5>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 18:08:24 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@...l.toshiba>
Cc: Frank.Li@....com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: dwc: visconti: Remove cpu_addr_fix() after
DTS fix ranges
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:34:08AM GMT, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>
> Remove cpu_addr_fix() since it is no longer needed. The PCIe ranges
> property has been corrected in the DTS, and the DesignWare common code now
> handles address translation properly without requiring this workaround.
>
What about the old DTs? Wouldn't this driver fail to work if you use it with old
DTs as cpu_addr_fixup() no longer exists?
- Mani
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@...l.toshiba>
>
> ---
> v3:
> Add pci->use_parent_dt_ranges fixes.
> Update Signed-off-by address, because my company email address haschanged.
>
> v2:
> No Update.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c | 15 ++-------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> index cdeac6177143c..d8765e57147af 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> @@ -171,20 +171,7 @@ static void visconti_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val | MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * In this SoC specification, the CPU bus outputs the offset value from
> - * 0x40000000 to the PCIe bus, so 0x40000000 is subtracted from the CPU
> - * bus address. This 0x40000000 is also based on io_base from DT.
> - */
> -static u64 visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup(struct dw_pcie *pci, u64 cpu_addr)
> -{
> - struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp;
> -
> - return cpu_addr & ~pp->io_base;
> -}
> -
> static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> - .cpu_addr_fixup = visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup,
> .link_up = visconti_pcie_link_up,
> .start_link = visconti_pcie_start_link,
> .stop_link = visconti_pcie_stop_link,
> @@ -310,6 +297,8 @@ static int visconti_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>
> + pci->use_parent_dt_ranges = true;
> +
> return visconti_add_pcie_port(pcie, pdev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists