[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DCOBWF0EZLHF.3FFVAB16SJ3FW@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 23:11:02 +0900
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas
Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, "Maarten Lankhorst"
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "John Hubbard"
<jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Alistair Popple" <apopple@...dia.com>, "Joel
Fernandes" <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] gpu: nova-core: move GSP boot code out of
`Gpu` constructor
On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 5:27 PM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 9:10 AM CEST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 8:12 AM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> On 9/2/25 4:31 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>> pub(crate) fn new(
>>>> pdev: &pci::Device<device::Bound>,
>>>> devres_bar: Arc<Devres<Bar0>>,
>>>
>>> The diff is hiding it, but with this patch we should also make sure that this
>>> returns impl PinInit<Self, Error> rather than Result<impl PinInit<Self>.
>>>
>>> I think this should be possible now.
>>
>> There is still code that can return errors (falcon creation, etc) - do
>> you mean that we should move it into the pin initializer and turn it
>> into a `try_pin_init`?
>
> Yeah, that would be better practice, if it doesn't work out for a good reason
> we can also fall back to Result<impl PinInit<Self, Error>, but we should at
> least try to avoid it.
I tried but could not do it in a way that is satisfying. The problem is
that `Gpu::new` receives a `Arc<Devres<Bar0>>`, which we need to
`access` in order to do anything useful with it. If we first store it
into the `Gpu` structure, then every subsequent member needs to `access`
it in its own code block in order to perform their own initialization.
This is quite cumbersome.
If there is a way to obtain the `Bar0` once after the `bar` member of
`Gpu` is initialized, and then use that instance with each remaining
member, then that problem would go away but I am not aware of such a
thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists