linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] gpio: renesas: Add support for GPIO and related interrupts in RZ/N1 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87segvtkha.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 22:54:41 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Wolfram
 Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, Hoan Tran
 <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Saravana Kannan
 <saravanak@...gle.com>, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, Herve
 Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard
 <pascal.eberhard@...com>, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] gpio: renesas: Add support for GPIO and related
 interrupts in RZ/N1 SoC

On Tue, Sep 09 2025 at 22:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09 2025 at 14:00, Herve Codina wrote:
>>   Patch 5 (new in v2)
>>    - Convert irqchip/ls-extirq to use for_each_of_imap_item
>>
>>   Patch 6 (new in v2)
>>    - Convert irqchip/renesas-rza1 to use for_each_of_imap_item
>
> How are those two patches related to adding GPIO support?
>
> AFAICT, they are completely unrelated and just randomly sprinkled into
> this series, but I might be missing something.

Ah. I missed that this iterator got introduced in this series. Did you
check whether that creates any conflicts against pending irqchip
patches?

Thanks,

        tglx