[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <634ae260-3a7b-475d-b40f-47401a70a53b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:00:53 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@...arskis.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Daniel Thompson
<danielt@...nel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, threeway@...il.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] leds: led-class: Add devicetree support to
led_get()
On 9/10/25 2:54 PM, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 10th, 2025 at 14:22, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/25 2:01 PM, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
>>
>>> From: Hans de Goede hansg@...nel.org
>>>
>>> Add 'name' argument to of_led_get() such that it can lookup LEDs in
>>> devicetree by either name or index.
>>>
>>> And use this modified function to add devicetree support to the generic
>>> (non devicetree specific) [devm_]led_get() function.
>>>
>>> This uses the standard devicetree pattern of adding a -names string array
>>> to map names to the indexes for an array of resources.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@...il.com
>>> Reviewed-by: Lee Jones lee@...nel.org
>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@...aro.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hansg@...nel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis alex@...arskis.com
>>> ---
>>
>>
>> I was thinking, perhaps we should introduce some sort of an exclusive
>> access mechanism, so that the e.g. user (or malware) can't listen to
>> uevents and immediately shut down the LED over sysfs
>
> It is already done by the original series from Hans (linked in cover),
> which was merged few years back. It is also the reason why this
> approach is used instead of typically used trigger-source - that
> would've indeed allowed anyone with access to sysfs to disable the
> indicator.
>
> As per Hans [1], v4l2-core would disable sysfs of privacy indicator:
>
> sd->privacy_led = led_get(sd->dev, "privacy-led")
> led_sysfs_disable(sd->privacy_led);
>
>
> Of course, this security only holds if one has secure boot enforced,
> kernel, modules, _and_ device-tree blobs are signed.
Great, thank you for this context
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists