[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <328b2f91-acef-4ee8-9562-9ec608124d07@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 06:46:23 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@...el.com>
Cc: dave@...olabs.net, josh@...htriplett.org, frederic@...nel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refperf: Remove redundant kfree() after
torture_stop_kthread()
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 11:11:48AM +0530, Kaushlendra Kumar wrote:
> Remove unnecessary kfree(main_task) call in ref_scale_cleanup() as
> torture_stop_kthread() already handles the memory cleanup for the
> task structure internally.
Again, thank you for your interest in Linux-kernel RCU!
And you are right that the kfree(main_task) is redundant, especially given
that the main_task pointer will be set to NULL in _torture_stop_kthread(),
so that this kfree() is just a confusing no-op.
> The torture_stop_kthread() function is designed to stop the kernel
> thread and free the associated task structure as part of its cleanup
> process. The additional kfree(main_task) call after torture_stop_kthread()
> results in a double-free condition.
But this last sentence needs adjustment. Because _torture_stop_kthread()
NULLs the pointer, the second kfree() gets a NULL pointer, thus not doing
a duplicate free, right?
> This pattern is consistent with other torture test modules where
> torture_stop_kthread() is called without explicit kfree() of the
> task pointer, as the torture framework manages the task lifecycle
> internally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/refscale.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
> index 2c2648a3ad30..2bfa987f4ba9 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
> @@ -1050,7 +1050,6 @@ ref_scale_cleanup(void)
> kfree(reader_tasks);
For ease of debugging with kdgb, drgn, and other tools, it would also
be good to set reader_tasks to NULL. Please feel free to do that,
either as part of this patch or as a separate patch.
Thanx, Paul
> torture_stop_kthread("main_task", main_task);
> - kfree(main_task);
>
> // Do scale-type-specific cleanup operations.
> if (cur_ops->cleanup != NULL)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists