[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ldmm499c.fsf@AUSNATLYNCH.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:28:31 -0500
From: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>, "Mario
Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@....com>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/13] dmaengine: sdxi: Add PCI driver support
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 01:48:33PM -0500, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay wrote:
>> +static int sdxi_pci_init(struct sdxi_dev *sdxi)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = sdxi_to_pci_dev(sdxi);
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + int dma_bits = 64;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + sdxi_err(sdxi, "pcim_enbale_device failed\n");
>
> s/pcim_enbale_device/pcim_enable_device/
Will fix.
>
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pci_set_master(pdev);
>> + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(dma_bits));
>
> I don't see the point of "dma_bits" over using 64 here.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists