[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMGbpDJhOx7wHqpo@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:39:16 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
gourry@...rry.net, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, raghavendra.kt@....com,
riel@...riel.com, rientjes@...gle.com, sj@...nel.org,
weixugc@...gle.com, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ziy@...dia.com,
dave@...olabs.net, nifan.cxl@...il.com, xuezhengchu@...wei.com,
yiannis@...corp.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
byungchul@...com, kinseyho@...gle.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com,
yuanchu@...gle.com, balbirs@...dia.com, alok.rathore@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] mm: Hot page tracking and promotion
infrastructure
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 08:16:45PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new subsystem for hot page tracking
> and promotion (pghot) that consolidates memory access information
> from various sources and enables centralized promotion of hot
> pages across memory tiers.
Just to be clear, I continue to believe this is a terrible idea and we
should not do this. If systems will be built with CXL (and given the
horrendous performance, I cannot see why they would be), the kernel
should not be migrating memory around like this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists