[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <684e83b3-756b-4995-9804-6b1d0cfa4103@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:10:06 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/virt/tdx: Use precalculated TDVPR page physical
address
On 9/10/25 09:06, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
>> struct tdx_vp {
>> /* TDVP root page */
>> struct page *tdvpr_page;
>> + /* precalculated page_to_phys(tdvpr_page) for use in noinstr code */
>> + phys_addr_t tdvpr_pa;
> Missing newline above the new field?
I was actually trying to group the two fields together that are aliases
for the same logical thing.
Is that problematic?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists