[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89100bace9824884215eb7641e144b8ee8835985.camel@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:47:25 +0000
From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>
To: "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
Haakon Bugge
<haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "rds-devel@....oracle.com" <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] rds: ib: Increment i_fastreg_wrs before bailing
out
On Wed, 2025-09-10 at 13:04 +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> We need to increment i_fastreg_wrs before we bail out from
> rds_ib_post_reg_frmr().
>
> We have a fixed budget of how many FRWR operations that can be
> outstanding using the dedicated QP used for memory registrations and
> de-registrations. This budget is enforced by the atomic_t
> i_fastreg_wrs. If we bail out early in rds_ib_post_reg_frmr(), we will
> "leak" the possibility of posting an FRWR operation, and if that
> accumulates, no FRWR operation can be carried out.
Hi Håkon,
This sounds much clearer, thank you!
>
> Fixes: 1659185fb4d0 ("RDS: IB: Support Fastreg MR (FRMR) memory registration mode")
> Fixes: 3a2886cca703 ("net/rds: Keep track of and wait for FRWR segments in use upon shutdown")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3:
> * Amended commit message
> * Removed indentation of this section
> * Fixing error path from ib_post_send()
>
> v1 -> v2: Added Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> net/rds/ib_frmr.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_frmr.c b/net/rds/ib_frmr.c
> index 28c1b00221780..395a99b5a65ca 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_frmr.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_frmr.c
> @@ -133,12 +133,15 @@ static int rds_ib_post_reg_frmr(struct rds_ib_mr *ibmr)
>
> ret = ib_map_mr_sg_zbva(frmr->mr, ibmr->sg, ibmr->sg_dma_len,
> &off, PAGE_SIZE);
> - if (unlikely(ret != ibmr->sg_dma_len))
> - return ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
> + if (unlikely(ret != ibmr->sg_dma_len)) {
> + ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
> + goto out_inc;
> + }
>
> - if (cmpxchg(&frmr->fr_state,
> - FRMR_IS_FREE, FRMR_IS_INUSE) != FRMR_IS_FREE)
> - return -EBUSY;
> + if (cmpxchg(&frmr->fr_state, FRMR_IS_FREE, FRMR_IS_INUSE) != FRMR_IS_FREE) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto out_inc;
> + }
>
> atomic_inc(&ibmr->ic->i_fastreg_inuse_count);
>
> @@ -166,11 +169,10 @@ static int rds_ib_post_reg_frmr(struct rds_ib_mr *ibmr)
> /* Failure here can be because of -ENOMEM as well */
> rds_transition_frwr_state(ibmr, FRMR_IS_INUSE, FRMR_IS_STALE);
>
> - atomic_inc(&ibmr->ic->i_fastreg_wrs);
> if (printk_ratelimit())
> pr_warn("RDS/IB: %s returned error(%d)\n",
> __func__, ret);
> - goto out;
Just one nit: This was the only place the out label was used isnt it? If so, lets go ahead and clear it out.
> + goto out_inc;
> }
>
> /* Wait for the registration to complete in order to prevent an invalid
> @@ -178,9 +180,11 @@ static int rds_ib_post_reg_frmr(struct rds_ib_mr *ibmr)
> * being accessed while registration is still pending.
> */
> wait_event(frmr->fr_reg_done, !frmr->fr_reg);
> -
> out:
With that fixed, you can go ahead and add my rvb:
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>
Thank you!
> + return ret;
>
> +out_inc:
> + atomic_inc(&ibmr->ic->i_fastreg_wrs);
> return ret;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists