[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f00c748-c3cd-4f31-aefd-b27a4af343be@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:31:18 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
"carl@...amperecomputing.com" <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
"lcherian@...vell.com" <lcherian@...vell.com>,
"bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com" <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
"baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"dfustini@...libre.com" <dfustini@...libre.com>,
"amitsinght@...vell.com" <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
"fenghuay@...dia.com" <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
"baisheng.gao@...soc.com" <baisheng.gao@...soc.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/33] arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and
kbuild boiler plate
Hi Shaopeng,
On 09/09/2025 08:03, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote:
>> Probing MPAM is convoluted. MSCs that are integrated with a CPU may only be
>> accessible from those CPUs, and they may not be online.
>> Touching the hardware early is pointless as MPAM can't be used until the
>> system-wide common values for num_partid and num_pmg have been
>> discovered.
>>
>> Start with driver probe/remove and mapping the MSC.
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a0d9a699a6e7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
>> +static int mpam_dt_parse_resources(struct mpam_msc *msc, void *ignored)
>> +{
>> + int err, num_ris = 0;
>> + const u32 *ris_idx_p;
>> + struct device_node *iter, *np;
>> +
>> + np = msc->pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + for_each_child_of_node(np, iter) {
>> + ris_idx_p = of_get_property(iter, "reg", NULL);
>> + if (ris_idx_p) {
>> + num_ris++;
>> + err = mpam_dt_parse_resource(msc, iter, *ris_idx_p);
>> + if (err) {
>> + of_node_put(iter);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!num_ris)
>> + mpam_dt_parse_resource(msc, np, 0);
> err = mpam_dt_parse_resource(msc, np, 0);
Oops! Thanks for catching that,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists