[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf+9PJgR5Eev_Z+QB4cp+VMctFfqpTMWuE3VsnGpZ6dJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:24:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com>, anshulusr@...il.com, dlechner@...libre.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] iio: light: ltr390: Implement runtime PM support
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:12 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:06:32 +0530
> Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com> wrote:
> > Thank you very much for your valuable feedback.
> > I do have a small request regarding the review process. Over the past 3–4
> > versions,most of the comments have been about fixing indentations and
> > improving code readability. I would kindly request if it would be possible
> > to consolidate such cosmetic comments into a single review round.
> >
> > I completely understand that incremental feedback makes sense when the code
> > is actively changing, but if the changes are minimal, spreading out minor
> > suggestions over multiple review cycles tends to unnecessarily increase the
> > turnaround time.
> >
> > Your support in this would help me address the comments more efficiently.
I can't always see _all_ problems at once, I am not a robot. I will
try my best, though.
...
> Andy, if you are fine with the explanation I'll tidy up the minor stuff
> whilst applying.
Yes, I am fine, go with it, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists