linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tools: ynl: fix errors reported by Ruff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e33b03ca-2d55-4541-825b-d3d01bd1a3a7@fiberby.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:16:31 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tools: ynl: fix errors reported by Ruff

On 9/9/25 9:07 PM, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> When looking at the YNL code to add a new feature, my text editor
> automatically executed 'ruff check', and found out at least one
> interesting error: one variable was used while not being defined.
> 
> I then decided to fix this error, and all the other ones reported by
> Ruff. After this series, 'ruff check' reports no more errors with
> version 0.12.12.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
> ---
> Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (8):
>        tools: ynl: fix undefined variable name
>        tools: ynl: avoid bare except
>        tools: ynl: remove assigned but never used variable
>        tools: ynl: remove f-string without any placeholders
>        tools: ynl: remove unused imports
>        tools: ynl: remove unnecessary semicolons
>        tools: ynl: use 'cond is None'
>        tools: ynl: check for membership with 'not in'

LGTM. When I first saw this, I expected it to collide
with my v2, but I have checked, and they don't clash.

Reviewed-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>